Table of Contents
Trilio has been part of the OpenStack backup conversation for a decade. It protects workloads from inside the cloud, through Keystone and a Horizon plugin, and that design suits many teams. It also defines the trade-offs.
If you are evaluating a Trilio alternative, the useful question is not which product ticks more boxes. It is where your recovery tooling lives when the cloud it protects is degraded, how many platforms it must cover over the next five years, and how predictable its cost stays as you grow.
This comparison sets Storware Backup and Recovery 8.0 for OpenStack against Trilio for OpenStack (T4O) 6.2 on those terms. It is based on each vendor’s public documentation as of October 2026.
In short:
- Architecture. Trilio runs inside OpenStack and relies on its Keystone authentication and Horizon UI. Storware runs as an independent backup and recovery platform with its own console, plus a Horizon plugin for self-service.
- Coverage. Trilio for OpenStack protects OpenStack. Storware protects OpenStack alongside VMware, Nutanix AHV, Proxmox VE, OpenShift Virtualization and more, under one license.
- Release support. Storware 8.0 supports OpenStack 2023.1 Antelope through 2026.1 Gazpacho. Trilio 6.2’s published matrix reaches 2025.2 Flamingo (Kolla).
Why OpenStack teams look for a Trilio alternative
Most teams that start looking are not unhappy with OpenStack backup as such. Their environment has changed around it. Five situations come up repeatedly in our conversations with cloud operators and enterprise architects.
1. OpenStack is no longer the only platform. VMware exits, edge clusters on Proxmox or Nutanix, and OpenShift Virtualization projects leave most organisations running several hypervisors at once. A backup tool scoped to one platform means a second and third tool, each with its own policies, retention and audit trail.
2. Recovery must work when the cloud does not. A backup layer that authenticates through Keystone and is operated through Horizon shares the fate of the control plane it protects. During a serious outage or a compromise, that is exactly the moment you need it.
3. Upgrades should not wait for the backup vendor. OpenStack ships two releases a year. Teams moving to 2026.1 want their data protection to be supported on day one, not after the next backup release.
4. Data sovereignty is now a procurement criterion. Under NIS2, DORA and national cloud strategies, European operators increasingly ask where the vendor is based and which jurisdiction governs it. Storware is headquartered in Warsaw; Trilio is headquartered in the United States.
5. Cost has to stay predictable. Adding a platform, a migration path or a new storage target should not trigger a new licence negotiation.
Storware vs Trilio for OpenStack: side-by-side
The biggest differences sit in architecture and scope, not in basic backup features. Both products take agentless, incremental backups of OpenStack instances and restore them with new flavors and networks.
| Capability | Storware Backup and Recovery 8.0 | Trilio for OpenStack 6.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Where it runs | Independent platform: Linux server, virtual or physical Storware Backup Appliance | Inside OpenStack: Trilio appliance plus a datamover on each compute node |
| Authentication and UI | Own web console with role-based access control; Horizon plugin for project self-service | Keystone authentication; Horizon plugin and CLI |
| OpenStack releases | 2023.1 Antelope to 2026.1 Gazpacho; RHOSP 17.1 and 18.0; Canonical OpenStack 2024.1 | RHOSO 18 (up to FR6); Kolla 2025.1 and 2025.2; MOSK/Helm 2023.2 to 2025.1; Canonical 2023.2 and 2024.1 |
| Keystone domains | Scoped (per-domain) and unscoped authorisation | Inherits OpenStack tenancy |
| Incremental method | Disk attachment with automatic incremental: native changed-block tracking for Ceph RBD and Pure Storage, checksum-based for other Cinder backends | Incremental-forever with synthetic full |
| Restore options | Full instance, single volume, file-level and instant restore; flavor and key pair selectable at restore | One-click, selective and in-place (volume rollback) restore |
| Backup destinations | File systems, S3-compatible object storage, tape, Storware Cloud | NFSv3, NFSv4, S3 |
| Immutability and isolation | Object Lock, Retention Lock, isoLayer air-gapped destination | S3 Object Lock |
| Other platforms, same product | VMware, Nutanix AHV, Proxmox VE, OpenShift Virtualization, Hyper-V, oVirt/OLVM, XCP-ng and more | OpenStack only (Kubernetes and OpenShift are separate Trilio products) |
| Recovery into OpenStack from other hypervisors | Citrix Hypervisor and XCP-ng to OpenStack; VMware backups recoverable to OpenStack | VMware-to-OpenStack migration as a separate offering |
| Vendor headquarters | Warsaw, Poland (EU) | United States |
Sources: Storware documentation: OpenStack, Storware OpenStack plugin, Trilio support matrix, Trilio restores, Trilio backup targets. Checked October 2026.
Five differences that matter in production
1. Recovery that does not depend on the cloud it protects
Trilio’s management plane is OpenStack itself: users authenticate through Keystone and work in Horizon. That is convenient day to day. It also means a Keystone or Horizon outage, or a compromised control plane, can take your recovery tooling down with it.
Storware runs as a separate platform with its own console and role-based access control. The Horizon plugin gives project users self-service backup and restore, but administrators never depend on it. Recovery plans define in advance which instances are restored, from which backup and to which target. They execute in one action and double as regular recovery tests.
Why it matters: business continuity standards and DORA expect recovery capabilities to be tested and usable during the disruption itself, not after the platform is back.
2. One platform for a multi-hypervisor estate
Few OpenStack clouds stand alone. Storware protects OpenStack, VMware, Nutanix AHV, Proxmox VE, OpenShift Virtualization, Hyper-V, oVirt and OLVM with the same policies, retention rules and reporting, under one universal licence. There are no per-platform fees or feature tiers.
During a VMware exit this means both sides of the transition stay protected by one tool. VMware workloads are backed up as usual and can be recovered to OpenStack; Citrix Hypervisor and XCP-ng workloads can be recovered to OpenStack the same way.
3. Ceph-native incremental backups
Ceph RBD backs most production OpenStack clouds. Storware’s disk attachment strategy selects the incremental method per volume automatically: native changed-block tracking for Ceph RBD and Pure Storage, checksum-based processing for other Cinder backends. Only changed blocks are read and transferred, which shortens backup windows and reduces load on production storage.
4. Day-one support for current OpenStack releases
Storware Backup and Recovery 8.0 supports OpenStack 2026.1 Gazpacho, alongside Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 and 18.0 and Canonical OpenStack. Teams can plan upgrades around their own roadmap instead of their backup vendor’s.
5. Layered protection against ransomware
Immutability is necessary but not sufficient on its own. Storware combines Object Lock and Retention Lock on S3-compatible storage, the isoLayer air-gapped destination, and tape for offline copies. Together they support a 3-2-1-1-0 strategy without additional products. See Immutable and Air-Gapped Backup Security.
Protect your OpenStack cloud with a platform built for multi-vendor environments.
When Trilio is the right choice
A fair comparison names the other side’s strengths. Trilio is a reasonable fit when:
- Your estate is OpenStack only and is expected to stay that way, so multi-platform coverage has no value.
- You want backup deployed with the cloud itself, through the same tooling your distribution uses, and you accept that it shares the control plane.
- In-place rollback is your main recovery pattern. Trilio’s in-place restore rewrites data on existing volumes when the instance is still present. Storware restores to new volumes instead.
- You already standardise on Trilio for Kubernetes and OpenShift and value one vendor for those two product lines.
If two or more of the five situations earlier in this article apply to you, a platform designed for multi-vendor environments will usually serve you better over a five-year horizon.
How to evaluate a Trilio alternative: a 7-point PoC checklist
Run any candidate through the same proof of concept on your own infrastructure. These seven tests separate a working backup from a working recovery.
- Control-plane outage test. Stop Keystone or Horizon in a test region. Can you still start and complete a restore?
- Release coverage. Is your current OpenStack release supported, and is the next one on the vendor’s roadmap?
- Ceph incremental efficiency. Measure data read and transferred for a second backup of a busy Ceph-backed instance.
- Full recovery plan. Restore a multi-instance application to a different project or cluster in one action, then time it against your RTO.
- Tenant isolation. Confirm project users see only their own instances and backups, across multiple Keystone domains.
- Ransomware scenario. Try to delete or modify a locked backup as an administrator. Confirm an isolated copy exists.
- Cost at year three. Price today’s estate, then add one more hypervisor and 30% more data.
Storware offers a 60-day trial with all features except V2V migration, so you can run the full checklist before you commit.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best Trilio alternative for OpenStack?
It depends on your estate. If you run OpenStack alongside VMware, Nutanix, Proxmox or OpenShift, or need recovery that works independently of the OpenStack control plane, Storware Backup and Recovery covers all of them on one platform and one licence.
Does Storware integrate with the OpenStack dashboard?
Yes. A Horizon plugin lets project users run backups, manage policies and schedules, restore instances and browse backups from the dashboard. Administrators also have Storware’s own console, so recovery never depends on Horizon being available.
Is Storware agentless for OpenStack?
Yes. Storware protects OpenStack instances through the OpenStack APIs and Cinder disk attachment, with no agents installed inside the protected instances.
Which OpenStack releases does Storware support?
Storware Backup and Recovery 8.0 supports OpenStack 2023.1 Antelope through 2026.1 Gazpacho, Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 and 18.0, and Canonical OpenStack 2024.1. Check the documentation for the current matrix.
Can Storware take incremental backups of Ceph RBD volumes?
Yes. Storware uses native changed-block tracking for Ceph RBD, so incremental backups read and transfer only the blocks that changed since the last backup.
Can Storware help while we move off VMware?
Yes. Storware backs up VMware workloads and can recover them to OpenStack, so data protection continues throughout the transition. Recovery from Citrix Hypervisor and XCP-ng to OpenStack is supported the same way.
How is Storware licensed?
One universal licence covers every supported platform, with no per-platform fees or feature tiers. A 60-day trial includes all features except V2V migration.
Can we switch from Trilio without losing existing backups?
Yes, if you plan the overlap. Keep Trilio restorable until its retention expires, start Storware policies in parallel, and decommission Trilio once Storware holds a full retention cycle.
Storware Backup and Recovery. #1 Backup & DR for OpenStack. Simplified. Scalable. Proven.

